medical care in prison may not be sufficient

no extradition to UK

Munich - 10 April 2019 - The Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Munich (1 AR 250/18) has declared the extradition of a German citizen to the British authorities for prosecution currently inadmissible, because the medical care of the persecuted person is not sufficiently secured in prison in England. In the course of the proceedings, medical examinations in Germany had created relatively high hurdles and the English had not succeeded, among other things, in proving the accessibility of a cardiologically oriented emergency ward within reasonable reach of the prison. Thus, the Munich Higher Regional Court came to the conclusion that the conditions of imprisonment in England to be expected for the persecuted person in the event of his extradition did not meet the requirements to be met in view of his state of health. The revocation of the previous extradition warrant was the necessary consequence (§ 24 para. 1 IRG).

In which prison would the persecuted person be placed in the event of his extradition?

A criterion of immense importance for the defence with regard to problematic conditions of detention in the requesting state is whether the authorities there are at all in a position to announce in advance in which prison the persecuted person would be accommodated in the event of his extradition. The English could not. However, in its judgment of 25 July 2018 - C-220/18 PPU, the European Court of Justice clarified that Article 1(3), Article 5 and Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (as amended on 26 February 2009) must be interpreted as meaning that the court must examine the conditions of detention in the detention centres in which the person to be extradited is likely to be detained, even if only temporarily or for transitional purposes.

In several other decisions, however, the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Munich takes the restrictive view that, on the basis of the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 25 June 2006, the court of first instance of the person to be extradited will be imprisoned. July 2018, C-220/18 PPU, only the conditions of detention in the prison in which the persecuted person will be admitted after the quarantine period (see OLG München (1st Criminal Senate), order of 16.01.2019 - 1 AR 442/18 with reference to OLG München, order of 06 August 2018 - 1 AR 296/18 -, juris).

European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and Brexit

The European Court of Justice  (ECJ decision of 19.9.2018 - C 327/18) has ruled that the UK's notice of withdrawal from the EU of 29.3.2017 does not per se lead to a refusal to enforce an EAW.

If an orderly separation takes place, the resignation treaty even provides for the continuation of the European Arrest Warrant, but with the possibility of refusing the extradition of one's own nationals.

If a "NO-DEAL-Brexit" were to occur, the European Convention on Extradition would again apply, so that in any case - even in ongoing proceedings - a new extradition request would have to be made.


Please call us on +49 (0) 211 1718380 or email us at to find out how we can help you.

Our firm maintains a 24 Hour Emergency Line +49(0)172-2112373 or +49(0)172-7056055

Contact us ...